comparison
| feature | screenpipe | fathom |
|---|---|---|
| scope | 24/7 screen + audio | meeting audio only (Zoom, Meet, Teams) |
| screen capture | all monitors, all apps | none |
| data storage | 100% local | cloud (Fathom’s servers) |
| open source | yes (MIT), 17k+ stars | no (proprietary) |
| works offline | yes | no |
| AI model | any (Claude, GPT, Ollama, local) | Fathom’s built-in AI only |
| CRM integration | via custom pipes | native Salesforce + HubSpot |
| price | $400 lifetime | ~$19–24/mo per user |
why screenpipe?
captures your full workday
Fathom records scheduled video calls on three platforms. screenpipe captures everything — meetings, Slack, code reviews, emails, browsing, research — 24/7, automatically.screen content alongside audio
when someone shares a dashboard and references specific numbers, screenpipe captures both the words and what’s on screen. Fathom only gets the audio — slides, URLs in chat, and shared documents are missed.no bot joining your calls
Fathom joins meetings as a visible participant on some platforms. hosts can block it, and attendees may feel uncomfortable. screenpipe captures on your device — no bot, no notification to others.local-first, open source, extensible
all data stays on your device. MIT-licensed with 17k+ GitHub stars. 45+ app integrations and 16+ pipes in the store. full REST API and MCP server for custom automations.get started
download the desktop appmore comparisons
- screenpipe vs Fathom (full comparison) - in-depth analysis
- screenpipe vs Fireflies - cloud meeting bot comparison
- screenpipe vs Otter.ai - cloud transcription comparison
- all comparisons - see how screenpipe stacks up